Why does NCARB argue the need for equitable relief?

The rationale behind NCARB's argument for the need for equitable relief is based on the premise that certain situations do not lend themselves to adequate remedies available at law, such as monetary compensation. When a legal remedy cannot fully address the harm or injustice experienced by a party, equitable relief becomes necessary. This form of relief seeks to provide a fair solution when the standard legal options fall short, enabling the injured party to obtain the appropriate remedy. For example, in cases involving unique properties or circumstances, simply providing financial damages may not resolve the issue effectively, making equitable remedies, such as injunctions or specific performance, essential to achieve just outcomes. In this context, understanding the significance of equitable relief underscores the importance of addressing diverse and complex legal scenarios where traditional remedies would be inadequate.